00:18:32 Gerald Griffin: Yes I have and it went fine 00:18:38 Jeff Paradis: Have not done this 00:19:41 Gerald Griffin: For us it fit into doing vectors 00:22:23 Gerald Griffin: OK we are talking about last weeks, I was talking about this weeks, never mind me, still groggy 00:23:48 Martin Vysohlid: Do people still consider pilot wave as alternative? 00:24:57 Steven Millward: The experiments that showed that Bell's inequality is violated reduced possible pilot-wave theories to those that have non-local connections. 00:29:43 Elena Kuchina: How did they got the idea to use beryllium and paraffin? 00:32:14 JOHN THOMPSON: the Edison methode 00:41:09 Gerald Griffin: Are we going to discuss the significance of the 1/137? 00:41:19 Nickolas Maloupis: Is the backwards arrow insinuating time flows differently for anti particles? 00:42:32 Celestina: is it safe to say that if the arrow is going out in direction is actually a positive particle? 00:42:59 Celestina: the arrows to provide distinction on which is which? 00:43:46 Tabatha Collins: I believe that is the correct answer. Someone with more experience will need to verify! 00:44:06 Spencer Pasero: I'll interject when we get to a good transition point - thanks for the questions! 00:45:08 Frederick Heyler: W hat does anticommute vs commute mean? 00:48:51 Gerald Griffin: LOL 00:51:05 Gerald Griffin: PBS SpaceTime has a good video on it 00:54:19 Allison Reinsvold Hall: First introduce yourselves! Then... - Share your results, including what events you chose to analyze - In particle collisions inside the D0 detector, what is the initial momentum p0 in the transverse plane? - Was the final observed momentum equal to the initial momentum? - Did you observe evidence for neutrino production in the D0 events? - How would this activity work in the classroom? 01:05:00 Tabatha Collins: Can we have a teacher’s guide on this activity and a solution guide? 01:05:14 Shane Wood: yes! 01:05:18 Dawn Sasek: There is one on quarknet 01:05:56 Shane Wood: Top Quark: https://quarknet.org/data-portfolio/activity/calculate-top-quark-mass 01:06:03 Tabatha Collins: Replying to "yes!" I looked and couldn’t find it?? 01:06:18 Shane Wood: teacher notes 01:06:31 Shane Wood: Replying to "yes!" In the teacher notes 01:07:54 Shane Wood: Replying to "yes!" https://quarknet.org/sites/default/files/content/portfolio/file/2024-01/topquarkmass%20teacher%20revivew%20dmr%20posted%200622_0.pdf 01:08:17 Shane Wood: Replying to "yes!" ...pages 2-3 in implementation section 01:08:33 Joanne Klonowski: Thanks, Shane. 01:09:01 Shane Wood: You are welcome :-) 01:09:02 Celestina: do we have the slides for session 2 available? 01:09:08 Gerald Griffin: You said it was a bonus question but I never saw it 01:09:58 Gerald Griffin: OK now I see it 01:11:54 Celestina: Session 2 has no slides posted 01:23:45 Gerald Griffin: Yes 01:40:18 patrickyim: What do quarks decay into? 01:42:01 Nickolas Maloupis: What is that we “see” with the deep inelastic scattering, magnetic field field distortion, current induction? 01:42:05 James Borrone: So basically, the quark "snaps" once it gets beyond a certain energy? 01:43:41 Steven Millward: In terms of the inelastic scattering it's kind of like the Rutherford experiment. From the angular distribution of scattered particles you can figure out the internal structure. 01:43:51 Martin Vysohlid: Is anyone finding some connections between strings theory and particles? 01:46:47 Gerald Griffin: Poetic 01:53:53 Allison Reinsvold Hall: Work with the people in your breakout groups to answer the following discussion questions about the 1974 November Revolution in particle physics. - Why was the discovery of the J/ψ particle in November 1974 so revolutionary? Many hadrons had been discovered by then – why was this one special? - What does the extremely narrow width of the J/ψ particle’s mass “bump” tell you about its lifetime? (recall last week’s homework assignment) - How did the results of Nov. 1974 and subsequent discoveries provide evidence for the quark model? Choose one person to enter your names and answers under your group number! https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ERdXlhYkSvTG13K4XoS_4ohM3G9DnNwIt5zhFgUzYGs/edit?usp=sharing 02:04:04 James Borrone: So Spencer has an 8-sied dye? Left over from DnD? 02:04:37 Baily: He must have a d14 02:04:53 James Borrone: Replying to "So Spencer has an 8-..." sided - excuse my typing. I type like carp. 02:05:29 Spencer Pasero: I used a d12 for that roll. But more importantly, I've got more dice on my desk than you can shake a stick at :-) Next time I'll grab a d20 02:05:51 JOHN THOMPSON: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0CC5MFBJX/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&th=1 02:06:19 Matt Peterie- Bishop Miege High School: I thought more possible decay paths meant longer life? 02:06:44 JOHN THOMPSON: has d3,4,5,6,7,8,10,.12,16,20,24,30 60 100 and it makes calling on students easier plus their just cool 02:06:51 Spencer Pasero: Replying to "https://www.amazon.c..." ❤️ 02:07:08 Spencer Pasero: Replying to "has d3,4,5,6,7,8,10,..." 👍 02:08:52 Gerald Griffin: LOL 02:09:01 patrickyim: Is there a limit to the number of generations? 02:09:29 Gerald Griffin: We don't know, might need a collider that orbits Earth to find it 02:10:17 James Borrone: So, Given that there is only one scalar boson (Higgs) are their others proposed? 02:10:55 James Borrone: Replying to "So, Given that there..." there (not their) 02:12:06 patrickyim: Thank you. 02:12:10 Alison Bulson: Thank you for another great class! 02:12:11 Nickolas Maloupis: I have a question about the bumps 02:12:19 Celestina: Thank you. Have a great evening. 02:12:20 Anastasia Perry: thank you! 02:12:22 Joanne Klonowski: Thanks! 02:12:24 patrickyim: Bye